British Columbia Ministry of Forests RECREATION MANUAL Chapter 8: Recreation Planning8.1 Introduction |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8.1 Introduction |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Land use planning |
Recreation planning (and recreation referrals) is one component of the Ministry of Forests' (MoF) approach to managing and protecting British Columbia's forest resources for the best short- and long-term economic, social and environmental benefit. Recreation planning must fit within the framework of the provincial land use strategy, with an emphasis on economic, environmental and social sustainability, public participation, and respect for aboriginal rights. It must also fit within the strategic and operational planning framework set out in the Forest Practices Code (the Code). Under the Code, public forest lands must be managed and used in a way that is consistent with, amongst other purposes, recreation, scenery and wilderness. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This chapter provides a |
Content of the chapterThis chapter serves as a practical guide for recreation staff on the role of district recreation planning in order:
[ Top ] |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8.2 Overview of Recreation Planning |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recreation planning is designed to provide input to strategic direction set out in strategic land use plans (SLUPs), including higher level plans under the Code, and operational plans for forest practices and recreation. Recreation planning is important for:
The key component of recreation planning is the district recreation plan (see Section 8.4 for a complete overview). [ Top ] |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8.3 Requirements for Recreation Planning and Referrals |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Planning LevelProvincial Policies |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Regional Priorities |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
District Recreation Planning |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
[ Top ] |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8.4 District Recreation Planning |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The overall purpose of district recreation planning is to provide recreation managers with a set of tools that will help them in protecting recreation resources and managing recreation use proactively and effectively over both the short- and long-term. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Definitions |
District Recreation Planning
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
District Recreation Plans
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
* Refer to the District Recreation Planning Manual (1997)for a detailed description of the recreation planning process. [ Top ] |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8.5 Management Plans for TFLs |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Management plans (MPs) for TFLs are prepared by the licensee and approved by the chief forester. However, the Crown portion of a TFL is public land, and full and final authority and accountability for recreation management on public land rests with the MoF, not with the licensee. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Although the licensee prepares the TFL management plan, the ministry is responsible for reviewing and approving (or rejecting) it. |
Therefore, recreation staff are responsible for reviewing and making recommendations regarding the management plan and its preparation. More specifically, recreation staff are responsible for ensuring that all recreation planning responsibilities that have been delegated to the licensee (by virtue of Section 35 of the Forest Act) are carried out in harmony with MoF management objectives. These include objectives for the protection and conservation of both timber and non-timber values, including visual quality and recreation resources. Responsibilities should also be carried out in accordance with MoF procedures and standards as set out in this manual. Management plans for TFLs are prepared based on a number of planning documents, three of which require specific recreation planning input. These three planning documents are:
The procedures for recreation planning in TFL planning are described below: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Planning StepStep 1 Preliminary Organization
|
Procedures (by planning step) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Step 2 Information Assembly
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Step 3 and 4
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Step 5 Selection of an Option
|
Review MP for its conformity to minimum content as set out in Sections 35 and 36 of the Forest Act:
Additional recommended content includes:
The responsibilities for recreation planning within TFL planning (i.e., for recreation input into or preparation of planning documents) are outlined below. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
B = Branch recreation and landscape staff R = Regional recreation and landscape staff D = District RO responsible for recreation and landscape L = TFL licensee RM = Regional manager CF = Chief forester [ Top ] |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8.6 Overview of the Land Use Planning Framework |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Strategic Land Use Plans (SLUPs)SLUPs provide strategic direction, primarily in the form of land use zoning that includes mapped zones with distinct names, and often includes objectives with strategies. SLUPs include:
The Forest Practices CodeOne of the primary vehicles for implementing land use planning and resource management in B.C. is the Forest Practices Code. The Code is comprised of four components:
The Code was designed to build on previously established planning processes, and introduced a number of new forest planning approaches. Planning under the Code is separated into two levels: higher level planning and operational planning. Higher level plans include those plans specified in Part 2 of the Act -- Strategic Planning, Objectives and Standards -- and plans produced under certain non-Code legislation or policy as specified in Section 1 (1) of the Act. Through the concept of higher level plans, plans that are prepared outside of the Code under other legislation or policy (e.g., SLUPs) can serve to legally influence forest practices. Table 1 illustrates all higher level plans referenced by the Code on the basis of the legal agent who declares, establishes or designates each plan. The links between higher level plans and operational plans are described below. Higher Level Plans definedHigher level plans establish the broader, strategic context for operational plans, providing objectives that determine the mix of forest resources to be managed in a given area. They fall into two categories:
In a broader sense, higher level plans refer to plans, agreements or objectives as defined in the Code. They are a "higher level" relative to operational plans, and are the primary source of objectives that play an important role in determining the forest practices described in an operational plan. A plan, such as the Kamloops Land and Resource Management Plan, may be approved as government policy. However, this approval does not make it a higher level plan. The plan, or a portion of it, must first be formally declared by the Lieutenant Governor in Council or the ministers as a higher level plan before the provisions of the Code concerning these plans can apply. The same general concept (with different approving authorities) applies to other higher level plans. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Table 1:
Higher Level Plans under the Code
* The chief forester has delegated the authority to establish objectives for interpretive forest sites and recreation sites and trails to the district manager. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate Provincial PoliciesBeyond statutes and regulations, there are certain provincial policies that can profoundly affect the nature and wording of goals, objectives and strategies in resource management plans. Those with the greatest effect are "corporate" policies, reflecting Cabinet direction. Examples of corporate policies that directly influence land use planning in B.C. include the Protected Areas Strategy, the Grizzly Bear Conservation Strategy, and the provincial timber supply policy that limits the impact of the Forest Practices Code to six percent reduction in timber harvests over the short term. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operational Plans Defined |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The application of forest practices is regulated under Part 4 of the Act, as well as addressed in guidebooks. |
Operational plans provide a description of forest resources and the location, timing and description of forest practices for the management, use and conservation of those resources. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The management and use of forest resources and the application of forest practices must be consistent with the purposes or objectives set out in Section 2 of the Act. |
Generally, before agreement holders or, in some cases, government can engage in these forest practices, they are required under the Act to submit operational plans (see Sections 19(1), 21(1), 22(3), 24(2), 26(2), 27(1)). The overall purpose and objectives for land use and resource management must be clearly determined before an operational plan is prepared for an area. The Code uses the concept of higher level plans as the main vehicle for this focusing or selection of objectives. Because operational plans must be consistent with higher level plans, the forest practices described in an operational plan must be consistent with the objectives provided in any higher level plan in effect in the area. Under the Code, an operational-level plan is determined to be consistent with higher level plan objectives if the operational plan does not "materially conflict" with them. In areas without Higher Level PlansIn all cases, whether a higher level plan is in effect or not, the district manager must be satisfied that an operational plan or amendment is in accordance with the Act and regulations, and will adequately manage and conserve forest resources. [ Top ] |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8.7 Land and Resource Management Planning |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Land and resource management planning (LRMP) is the sub-regional integrated resource planning process for British Columbia. This planning process considers all resource values and requires public participation, interagency coordination, and consensus-based land and resource management decisions. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LRMP is the sub-regional integrated resource planning process. |
LRMPs cover sub-regional areas of approximately 15 000 to 25 000 square kilometres. The plans establish direction for land use and specify resource management objectives and strategies. They provide a comprehensive, broadly accepted and approved management framework to guide resource development and more detailed planning. Some examples of LRMP land use categories that have been used in the past include:
How does LRMP link to other planning and resource management processes currently underway? |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LRMP guides lower level plans |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recreation role in LRMP |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Use of ROS classes found important in LRMP |
LRMP processes generally attempt to assess the relative diversity of recreation opportunities. Indicators that measure changes in ROS classes have been used in most LRMP processes to date and have been found to be important. In addition to diversity of opportunity indicators, the visual quality measure has been used in previous LRMP to assess plan scenario impacts on lake shores and important visual corridors. [ Top ] |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8.8 Resource Management Zones |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Section 3 of the Act allows for the creation of resource management zones (RMZs) and objectives under authority of the ministers (MOF, MELP, & MEM) |
Resource management zones (RMZs) are the primary resource planning vehicle for implementing the province's social, economic and environmental objectives for land use by enabling broad zoning of forest lands based on objectives from regional plans, and land and resource management plans. One example of a possible RMZ objective is, "Maintain the visual quality of the regionally significant areas shown in map 4." Subsequent operational plans must be consistent with RMZs and any associated objectives. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Use of RMZs
|
The chief forester policy for using RMZs, as set out in Section 4.4.2 of Higher Level Plans: Policy and Procedures (1996), indicates that:
[ Top ] |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8.9 Landscape Units |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Section 4 of the Act provides the district manager with the authority to establish LUs. |
Landscape units (LUs) are areas of land and water, usually covering a watershed or other physiographic area, established for coordinating the long-term planning and development of resources. Objectives for LUs may be established for all forest resources as defined in the Act, including:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Establishing objectives |
Prior to establishing, varying or canceling an objective for a LU where the objective deals with a forest resource other than a recreation resource, the district manager must obtain the approval of a designated environment official. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Facilitate management for a range of purposes |
Chief forester policy for establishing LU objectives, as set out in Section 5.5.1 of Higher Level Plans: Policy and Procedures (1996), indicates that:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Strategic Planning Regulation |
The Strategic Planning Regulation provides that a district manager may address certain matters when establishing LU objectives, including retention of old growth, landscape connectivity, and temporal and spatial distribution of cutblocks. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Two alternatives for LU objectives
|
There are two alternatives for establishing LU objectives:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The second alternative is more effective after higher level plans are declared |
Section 5.13.3 of Higher Level Plans: Policy and Procedures (1996), sets out detailed procedures for both alternatives. [ Top ] |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8.10 Sensitive Areas |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sensitive areas (SAs) are small areas of land and water that have unique or locally significant forest resources that are frequently sensitive to resource development activities. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Section 5 of the Act provides the district manager with the authority to establish sensitive areas. |
Sensitive areas and objectives may be established to manage or conserve small areas of unique or locally significant forest resources. Examples of SAs could include, but are not limited to, a rare plant community, a hot spring and surrounding forest, or a concentration of forest resources or resource features that, in combination, enhance site sensitivity. While development, such as access or timber harvesting, may be restricted, sensitive areas are not generally intended to preclude harvesting and other activities that are compatible with the values for which the sensitive area has been established. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developing objectives |
Chief forester policy, as set out in Section 6.9.2, Higher Level Plans: Policy and Procedures (1996), states that: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Designated environment official to be consulted, except for objectives that apply to recreation resources. |
[ Top ] |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8.11 Interpretive Forest Sites, Recreation Sites and Trails |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Section 6 of the Act provides the Chief Forester with the authority to establish recreation sites and trails |
The purpose of establishing recreation sites and trails is to protect recreation resources and facilitate public recreation use of Crown forest lands. In addition, interpretive forest sites are established to facilitate forest education. The management goal of each site and trail should be to provide an overall condition of safety, sanitation, social acceptability and environmental soundness that complements the facilities and recreation programs of other agencies and the private sector. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Authority to establish site and trail objectives is delegated by the chief forester to the district manager |
Procedures and responsibilities for establishing a recreation map notation (for Crown land within a provincial forest) or Land Act reserve (for Crown land outside a provincial forest) are set out in Appendix 10 of the Higher Level Plans: Policy and Procedures (1996) document. Chief forester procedures, set out in Section 7.6.3 of the Higher Level Plans: Policy and Procedures (1996), request the district manager to ensure that: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Generally, requests to establish sites and trails will be collated by the branch and submitted to the chief forester in batches |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ObjectivesObjectives must be established within six months of establishing interpretive forest sites, recreation sites or recreation trails |
In order to ensure that the objectives for sites and trails are expressed in a consistent and standard manner, and that the objectives are measurable to enable monitoring and evaluation, objectives may be expressed in the following terms:
[ Top ] |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8.12 References |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Forest Practices Code of British Columbia Act, Province of B.C. Forest Practices Code of BC Act Regulations, Province of B.C.
Higher Level Plans: Policy and Procedures (1996), Ministry of Forests Draft Forest District Recreation Planning Manual (1997), Ministry of Forests Forest Act, Province of B.C. [ Top ] |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|