GMOs are Safer Than “Natural” Hybrids

Peppermint, a hybrid of Spearmint and WatermintPeople try to claim that Genetically Modified Organisms, for example corn with a gene spliced in that helps it resist a disease, are somehow more dangerous, because we don’t know what other changes the splicing may have wrought.

The claim is made that that they are somehow “unproven” and could contain some surprise risk, but this is the opposite of the truth. Whenever you pollinate a plant normally, the seeds you get have hundreds, or thousands, of unknown factors in them, as they’re a random mix of two parent plants. Hybrids, for example, are an extreme case of this.

But a GMO is a known cultivar with a SINGLE gene moved. Not tens of thousands of genes moved at random, just a single one (or set of similarly chosen ones). It is the most KNOWN kind of modified plant, with the fewest surprise protein combinations possible.

Now if you have some spearmint, and some watermint, you might cross-pollinate them, and then who knows…some people might be specifically allergic to the resulting, unique cultivar (which we call peppermint). But if you move ONE gene from the watermint to the spearmint, you can know exactly what the results will be.

About kazvorpal
Polyamorous, libertarian heinleiner. ENTP, student of traditional Shaolin kung fu, writer, cunning linguist.

2 Responses to GMOs are Safer Than “Natural” Hybrids

  1. ozestrange666Mike W says:

    If gm modification is safe or not has zero to do with your ridiculous metaphor.
    There is zero scientific comparison/analogies etc between normal breeding and insertion of genes into plants.
    If you do not understand that simple fact..then its best not to let the world know you are 100% clueless about how science and biology works.
    Go read a book like Genetic roulette by smith..or do “libertarians” not have to read anything based on pr from Monsanto :)

    • kazvorpal says:

      > There is zero scientific comparison/analogies etc
      > between normal breeding and insertion of genes into plants

      It’s not an just analogy, not an anlogy, it’s actually the same thing.

      In one case, it’s specific, known genes in the new individual. In the other, it’s a random hodge-podge of genes. If either were a risky unknown, it would be normal sexual reproduction.

      This is a scientific fact.

      You are not making any actual positive assertions, just denying in a meaninglessly vague way.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: