The Effects of Historical Housing Policies on Resident Exposure to Intra-Urban Heat: A Study of 108 US Urban Areas
Science Museum of Virginia, Richmond, VA 23220, USA
Center for Environmental Studies, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23220, USA
Nohad A. Toulan School of Urban Studies and Planning, Portland State University, Portland, OR 97201, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Climate 2020, 8(1), 12; https://doi.org/10.3390/cli8010012
Received: 5 November 2019 / Revised: 21 December 2019 / Accepted: 3 January 2020 / Published: 13 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Survivability under Overheating - The impact of Regional and Global Climate Change on Vulnerable and Low Income population)
The increasing intensity, duration, and frequency of heat waves due to human-caused climate change puts historically underserved populations in a heightened state of precarity, as studies observe that vulnerable communities—especially those within urban areas in the United States—are disproportionately exposed to extreme heat. Lacking, however, are insights into fundamental questions about the role of historical housing policies in cauterizing current exposure to climate inequities like intra-urban heat. Here, we explore the relationship between “redlining”, or the historical practice of refusing home loans or insurance to whole neighborhoods based on a racially motivated perception of safety for investment, with present-day summertime intra-urban land surface temperature anomalies. Through a spatial analysis of 108 urban areas in the United States, we ask two questions: (1) how do historically redlined neighborhoods relate to current patterns of intra-urban heat? and (2) do these patterns vary by US Census Bureau region? Our results reveal that 94% of studied areas display consistent city-scale patterns of elevated land surface temperatures in formerly redlined areas relative to their non-redlined neighbors by as much as 7 °C. Regionally, Southeast and Western cities display the greatest differences while Midwest cities display the least. Nationally, land surface temperatures in redlined areas are approximately 2.6 °C warmer than in non-redlined areas. While these trends are partly attributable to the relative preponderance of impervious land cover to tree canopy in these areas, which we also examine, other factors may also be driving these differences. This study reveals that historical housing policies may, in fact, be directly responsible for disproportionate exposure to current heat events. View Full-Text
Keywords: urban heat islands; environmental justice; climate change; redlining►▼ Show Figures
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
- Supplementary File 1:
PDF-Document (PDF, 437 KB)
MDPI and ACS Style
Hoffman, J.S.; Shandas, V.; Pendleton, N. The Effects of Historical Housing Policies on Resident Exposure to Intra-Urban Heat: A Study of 108 US Urban Areas. Climate 2020, 8, 12.
AMA StyleShow more citation formats Show less citations formats
Hoffman JS, Shandas V, Pendleton N. The Effects of Historical Housing Policies on Resident Exposure to Intra-Urban Heat: A Study of 108 US Urban Areas. Climate. 2020; 8(1):12.Chicago/Turabian Style
Hoffman, Jeremy S.; Shandas, Vivek; Pendleton, Nicholas. 2020. "The Effects of Historical Housing Policies on Resident Exposure to Intra-Urban Heat: A Study of 108 US Urban Areas." Climate 8, no. 1: 12.
Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
Article Access StatisticsFor more information on the journal statistics, click here.
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.
Zoom | Orient | As Lines | As Sticks | As Cartoon | As Surface | Previous Scene | Next Scene